when speaking in today's society of "work" is to always "paid" a work meant. Work today means primarily not to do something meaningful, or even at all do what you want to achieve on its own really, but to generate an income. In this sense, work in our society is a sacred duty: every responsible citizen in this respect has a quasi-sovereign responsibility for its own existence.
If someone, for whatever reason, is unable to fulfill this responsibility successfully, then he will get money from the state. In this context, we then speak of something like "solidarity", which means something like: In our enlightened society we do not let the unfortunate and clumsy and "work disabled" in the lurch. Basically, this solidarity is based, however, to an anxiety: too many people with serious unrest existence needs to bring in the company, which could ultimately threaten the enlightened order of things.
from the idea that doing "free" the people would have what they own initiative - on the basis of "free" decisions - want to do, we are in any far away. To achieve this freedom, there is in today's society really only one way, namely to define himself as a freelance contractor. With all other forms of paid work is an integration along in non-free connections: you work for McDonalds, for the Ministry for a Waldorf school or for Greenpeace. That the concrete or abstract goals of one organization may be "good" and that of others may be "less good" changes nothing. A free to
entrepreneur means, but not that one necessarily to do that then you need to do. I need at this point not to describe all the factors that prevent an entrepreneur working to make his "work" for free - they are known. Add to that the fundamental question of whether the underlying decision was truly free, and the pulse is a "free" to become entrepreneurs, sometimes based on lack of freedom unnoticed.
My concern in this text will of the public company not understood and accepted - as an activity subject - especially the fact that there are a lot of people want something, something really WANT that as a working subject said better. To modify an educational concept of the special teachers in a social Henning Köhler: there are "new talent profiles" which are not perceived as such. In other words, people can do something that is not generally recognized as a meaningful activity.
An example is a good friend of mine. It is not easy to describe what he does exactly. He is constantly on the go, working on so-called "ecological" and "social" projects, connects people to each other, can "read" what people want, open doors, reach-set unattainable goals, inspired by his positive attitude to life. To be more precise: his talent profile is the fact that he can actually feel (which does not mean that he can always put into words), hidden potentials which lie between the parties. One could not say again that he is a "networker" because his inspiring activities go far beyond. I regard him as a "fate-yourself".
On the financial level, he gets his life but not organized. It is in this respect front of an abyss, the way he accepted with a certain lightness. Nevertheless, this abyss, which is an abyss: an abyss. To have by feeding as "unemployed" by the state, he does not want, did not get because he will be too little money - he comes out with very little - but because connected with the money of the obligation to apply for jobs that he not want to do. He thus faces a question that is not a question, go with what he really wants to do to stop or so and report to the employment office.
text in a blog can be such a biographical situations are failing because always a hundred things also play a role for the hundreds of pages are needed. I feel however, that in this respect there is an urgent issue that is crucial for the development of a culture of the heart. Just wait for it until the unconditional income is introduced is not, even more so, to get this far, are today just the suggested new talent profiles used. What does that mean?
That is my opinion that the concrete must Schicksalsflechtwerke around the participants to take an initiative. Ultimately, and it can and may yet be the "free" citizens, "friends" so that freedom from (one might also say, ask on the basis of understanding) to a commitment? In practical terms, twenty times fifty euros a month would bring thousands of euros. And it could be a fate experienced worker who is used to make do with little money to live well for a while, say once: for a year?
to participate in the biography of "friend" is an important aspect of a culture of the heart. Without this practical involvement, there is no culture of the heart. To the development of such a culture is precisely that of relevant experience and advances are made. With the introduction of such participation, the social sites of the future based on mutual, free recognition based created. With an old solidarity and support that has nothing to do.
0 comments:
Post a Comment